Cases 31 - 40 of 3,937
MORGAN v. O'MALLEY
as 1:2024cv00252
Plaintiff:
MARK R. MORGAN
Defendant:
MARTIN O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
GUTHRIE v. O'MALLEY
as 1:2024cv00224
Plaintiff:
CHASITY D. GUTHRIE
Defendant:
MARTIN O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
Anderson v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00045
Plaintiff:
Rosemary Anderson
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley and Commissioner of Social Security
Not Yet Classified:
General Counsel SSA (Court use only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
BEKOWITZ v. O'MALLEY
as 4:2024cv00005
Plaintiff:
TONYA MARIE BEKOWITZ
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY and MARTIN O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
MELTON v. O'MALLEY
as 1:2024cv00055
Plaintiff:
DONNA K. MELTON
Defendant:
MARTIN O'MALLEY and MARTIN J. O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
BUDD v. O'MALLEY
as 1:2024cv00056
Plaintiff:
TRACY ALLEN BUDD
Defendant:
KILOLO KIJAKAZI, ACTING COMMISSIONER OF THE SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION and MARTIN J. O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
PEACHES v. O'MALLEY
as 3:2024cv00007
Plaintiff:
BRANDY N. PEACHES
Defendant:
MARTIN O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
CAROSELLI v. O'MALLEY
as 1:2024cv00050
Plaintiff:
JACK CAROSELLI
Defendant:
KILOLO KIJAKAZI and MARTIN J. O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
AUSTIN v. O'MALLEY
as 1:2024cv00024
Plaintiff:
EZRA SHERMAN HENRY AUSTIN
Defendant:
MARTIN J. O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
SELBY v. O'MALLEY
as 3:2023cv00237
Plaintiff:
KENNETH E. SELBY
Defendant:
MARTIN O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
