Cases 71 - 80 of 313
RHODES v. ASTRUE
as 4:2011cv00126
Defendant:
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM A. RHODES
Miscellaneou:
SSA (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
KOCH v. ASTRUE
as 3:2011cv00133
Defendant:
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE
Plaintiff:
JODY L. KOCH
Miscellaneou:
SSA (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
GALLI v. ASTRUE
as 1:2011cv01422
Defendant:
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE
Plaintiff:
ROBIN V. GALLI
Miscellaneou:
SSA (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
SMITH v. ASTRUE
as 1:2011cv01350
Defendant:
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM SMITH
Miscellaneou:
SSA (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
TEER v. ASTRUE
as 1:2011cv01339
Defendant:
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE
Miscellaneou:
SSA (Court Use Only)
Plaintiff:
FREDERICA M. TEER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
ALLEN v. ASTRUE
as 1:2011cv01340
Plaintiff:
ERIKA S. ALLEN
Defendant:
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE
Miscellaneou:
SSA (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
BIVENS v. ASTRUE
as 1:2011cv01310
Defendant:
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE
Plaintiff:
MARY A. BIVENS
Miscellaneou:
SSA (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
DAY v. ASTRUE
as 4:2011cv00114
Defendant:
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE
Plaintiff:
FRANK F. DAY
Miscellaneou:
SSA (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
FISHER v. ASTRUE
as 4:2011cv00113
Defendant:
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE
Plaintiff:
HARLAN FISHER
Miscellaneou:
SSA (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
HERRON v. ASTRUE et al
as 1:2011cv01234
Defendant:
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE
Plaintiff:
DALLAS L. HERRON
Miscellaneou:
SSA (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
