Cases 1 - 10 of 1,246
Hunt et al v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2024cv00511
Plaintiff:
Shantelle M. Hunt
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
General Counsel Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402 Social Security Benefits
Vedrenne v. Social Security Administration
as 2:2024cv01580
Plaintiff:
Penny M. Vedrenne
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Williams-Tubbs v. Social Security
as 3:2024cv00834
Plaintiff:
Quandetamashuan P Williams-Tubbs
Defendant:
U S Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Hogue v. O'Malley
as 3:2024cv00825
Plaintiff:
Joseph Hogue
Defendant:
Martin J O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Kemp v. O'Malley
as 3:2024cv00495
Plaintiff:
Mary Kemp
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Richard v. Social Security Administration
as 3:2024cv00496
Plaintiff:
Ryan Richard
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Sanzone v. Social Security Administration
as 2:2024cv01528
Not Yet Classified:
Cindy Branch Sanzone and Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Garcia v. Social Security Administration
as 2:2024cv01534
Plaintiff:
Celia Garcia
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Littlejohn, Jr. v. Social Security Administration
as 2:2024cv01507
Plaintiff:
Hollis K. Littlejohn, Jr.
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Hill v. O'Malley
as 3:2024cv00785
Plaintiff:
Deborah Hill
Defendant:
Martin J O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
