Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Adams v. Kijakazi
as 1:2023cv03197
Plaintiff:
Zachary Adams
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Interested Party:
Ssaogcomms SSA Notify
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Adams-Frazier v. Commissioner Social Security Administration
as 8:2023cv02351
Plaintiff:
Candy C. Adams-Frazier
Defendant:
Commissioner Social Security Administration and Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Interested Party:
Ssaogcomms SSA Notify
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 rs Review of HHS Decision (RSI)
Adams v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 8:2022cv01573
Plaintiff:
Anthony Fuzell Adams
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
SSA Notify
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Krump v. Kijakazi
as 8:2022cv01262
Plaintiff:
Adam Charles Krump
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Interested Party:
SSA Notify - DO NOT USE!
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Adams v. Kijakazi
as 8:2022cv00535
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Jonathan Adams
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Interested Party:
SSA Notify
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Adams v. Kijakazi
as 1:2022cv00021
Plaintiff:
Zachary Stephens Adams
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Interested Party:
SSA Notify
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Adams-Frazier v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 8:2020cv02580
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
Candy C. Adams-Frazier
Interested Party:
SSA Notify
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 id
Krump v. Saul
as 8:2019cv02999
Interested Party:
SSA Notify
Defendant:
Andrew M. Saul
Plaintiff:
Adam Charles Krump
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Adams v. Berryhill
as 8:2018cv02073
Plaintiff:
Charles Adams
Defendant:
Nancy A. Berryhill
Interested Party:
SSA Notify
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Adams v. Berryhill
as 8:2018cv01504
Plaintiff:
Linda Adams
Defendant:
Nancy A. Berryhill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
