Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Pou v. O'Malley
as 2:2024cv00179
Plaintiff:
Jesus David Pou
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley and Norfolk-NN (IP) USA - SS 405g Notice
Interested Party:
SSA (Social Security Administration)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Anzalone v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2023cv01513
Plaintiff:
Ronald David Anzalone
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
SSA (Social Security Administration) and Alexandria (IP) USA - SS 405g Notice
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Gillespie, Jr. v. Kijakazi
as 3:2023cv00507
Plaintiff:
David F Gillespie, Jr.
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Interested Party:
SSA (Social Security Administration)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Ragland v. Kijakazi
as 1:2022cv01386
Plaintiff:
David Ragland
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Interested Party:
SSA (Social Security Administration)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Duval v. Kijakazi
as 2:2022cv00018
Plaintiff:
David T. Duval
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Mullins v. Kijakazi
as 2:2021cv00034
Plaintiff:
David A. Mullins
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Thomas v. Saul
as 7:2019cv00549
Plaintiff:
David Dakota Thomas
Defendant:
Andrew M. Saul
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Harris v. Berryhill
as 5:2019cv00014
Defendant:
Nancy A. Berryhill
Plaintiff:
David Shannon Harris
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
McLaughlin v. Berryhill
as 1:2018cv00045
Plaintiff:
David C McLaughlin
Defendant:
Nancy Berryhill, United States Attorney for the Western District of Virignia and Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Addington v. Berryhill
as 2:2018cv00034
Defendant:
Nancy A. Berryhill
Plaintiff:
David L. Addington
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
