Cases 1 - 10 of 44
Wilkins-Smith v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2024cv03010
Plaintiff:
Ruby Lee Wilkins-Smith
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
Social Security - Office of the General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Smith v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv00222
Plaintiff:
Willie J. Smith, Jr.
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Smith v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 4:2022cv04184
Plaintiff:
Michael Smith
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
CSS-Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Mitsuuchi-Smith v. Kijakazi
as 1:2022cv06777
Plaintiff:
Edie Mitsuuchi-Smith
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Smith v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2022cv01169
Plaintiff:
Alexandra A Smith
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
SSAOGC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Smith Jackson v. Kijakazi
as 1:2022cv02607
Plaintiff:
Nicole Maria Smith Jackson
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Smith v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2022cv01081
Plaintiff:
Joseph Scott Smith
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
CSS-Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Smith v. Kijakazi
as 1:2021cv06874
Plaintiff:
Gail Lavone Smith
Defendant:
Acting Commissioner Kilolo Kijakazi and Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Smith v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2021cv01276
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
Aaron Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Smith v. Saul
as 1:2020cv06664
Defendant:
Commissioner Andrew Saul
Plaintiff:
JENNIFER BOBBIEJO SMITH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
