Cases 1 - 10 of 382
Pelley v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00253
Plaintiff:
Aimee Lynn Pelley
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Higgins et al
as 2:2024cv00252
Plaintiff:
Alyce L Higgins and Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402 Social Security Benefits
Andrus v. Commission of Social Security
as 4:2024cv00240
Plaintiff:
Troy K Andrus
Defendant:
Commission of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Taylor v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00144
Petitioner:
Kyle Steven Taylor
Respondent:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Sharp v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv00145
Plaintiff:
Jerold Sharp
Defendant:
Comm. of Soc. Sec. Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Logston v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 4:2024cv00133
Petitioner:
Brandy Carole Logston
Respondent:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Moon v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 4:2024cv00130
Petitioner:
Dawn Louise Moon
Respondent:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Devenney v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 4:2024cv00222
Petitioner:
Wendy Sune Devenney
Respondent:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Downs v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00116
Petitioner:
Michele Downs
Respondent:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Munger v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00208
Petitioner:
Curtis Edward Munger
Respondent:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
