Cases 111 - 120 of 498
BALDWIN v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 5:2019cv03921
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Interested Party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Plaintiff:
DORCA D. BALDWIN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
MAKOWSKI v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 2:2019cv03821
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Interested Party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Plaintiff:
GREGORY MAKOWSKI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
GOLDSTON v. SAUL
as 2:2019cv03753
Defendant:
ANDREW SAUL
Plaintiff:
CORNELIA GOLDSTON
Interested Party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
TATE v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 2:2019cv03751
Plaintiff:
MONNAE ANGELIQUE TATE
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Interested Party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
WASHINGTON v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 2:2019cv03732
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Plaintiff:
RACHAEL WASHINGTON
Interested Party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
LAPENNA v. BERRYHILL
as 2:2019cv03718
Plaintiff:
MICHELE LAPENNA
Interested Party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Defendant:
NANCY A. BERRYHILL and ANDREW SAUL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
GRANBERRY v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 2:2019cv03715
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Interested Party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Plaintiff:
TYRIAN D GRANBERRY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
MORALES v. BERRYHILL
as 2:2019cv03616
Interested Party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Plaintiff:
BERNICE MORALES
Defendant:
NANCY A. BERRYHILL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
SANTIAGO v. SAUL
as 2:2019cv03580
Plaintiff:
RAMONA DELGADO SANTIAGO
Interested Party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Defendant:
ANDREW M. SAUL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
BRIGGS v. SAUL
as 2:2019cv03581
Plaintiff:
REGINA R. BRIGGS
Interested Party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Defendant:
ANDREW M. SAUL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
