Supplemental Security Income Cases filed in Minnesota
Cases 121 - 130 of 155
Jacobs v. Astrue et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 0:2008cv00431
Plaintiff: Anita M Jacobs
Defendant: Michael J Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Stoops v. Astrue et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 0:2008cv00221
Plaintiff: Nita L Stoops
Defendant: Michael J Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Haynes v. Astrue
as 0:2008cv00208
Plaintiff: Wardell Haynes
Defendant: Michael J Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383 Review of HHS Decision
Gallagher v. Astrue et al
as 0:2008cv00132
Plaintiff: Barbara Gallagher
Defendant: Michael J Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383 Review of HHS Decision
Peterson v. Astrue et al
as 0:2007cv04698
Plaintiff: Terry A Peterson
Defendant: Michael J Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383 Review of HHS Decision
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 0:2007cv04656
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383 Review of HHS Decision
Hodge v. Astrue We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 0:2007cv04435
Plaintiff: Don Hodge and Don Hodge
Defendant: Michael J Astrue and Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Armstrong v. Astrue et al
as 0:2007cv04310
Plaintiff: Aruchunan Anthony Armstrong
Defendant: Michael J Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Emerson v. Astrue et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 0:2007cv04272
Plaintiff: Robert Emerson
Defendant: Michael J Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Hutmaker v. Astrue
as 0:2007cv04112
Plaintiff: Ricardo Hutmaker and Ricardo Hutmaker
Defendant: Michael J Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383 Review of HHS Decision

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?