Supplemental Security Income Cases filed in Pennsylvania
Cases 11 - 20 of 51
TUCKER v. SAUL
as 2:2020cv01366
Defendant: ANDREW SAUL
Interested Party: SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Plaintiff: MICHAEL ANTHONY TUCKER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
WOLF v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2019cv00295
Defendant: COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECUIRTY and COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Plaintiff: SEAN ANTHONY WOLF
CHIMENTO v. SAUL We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2019cv00945
Defendant: ANDREW M. SAUL
Plaintiff: CARMEN ANTHONY CHIMENTO, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383
Springer v. Berryhill We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2019cv01080
Plaintiff: Michael Anthony Springer
Defendant: Nancy A. Berryhill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Fasulo v. Berryhill
as 1:2019cv00874
Plaintiff: Anthony Fasulo
Defendant: Nancy A. Berryhill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
HOWARD v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2019cv02262
Defendant: COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Interested Party: SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Plaintiff: ANTHONY HOWARD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383
SIMPSON v. BERRYHILL We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2018cv00125
Plaintiff: MARK ANTHONY SIMPSON
Defendant: NANCY A. BERRYHILL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
DiMassimo v. Berryhill We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2017cv01085
Plaintiff: Michael Anthony DiMassimo
Defendant: Nancy Berryhill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
ANTHONY v. COLVIN
as 5:2016cv01417
Plaintiff: SHARON ANTHONY
Defendant: CAROLYN W. COLVIN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
MARTIN v. COLVIN We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2016cv01223
Plaintiff: ANTHONY DELROY MARTIN
Defendant: CAROLYN W. COLVIN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?