Cases 21 - 30 of 49
Hartel v. Social Security Administration
as 3:2013cv01094
Plaintiff:
Jerry E. Hartel
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Brown v. Social Security Administration
as 3:2013cv00799
Plaintiff:
Julia E. Brown
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Gilmore v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner of et al
as 4:2013cv00043
Plaintiff:
Shannon E. Gilmore
Defendant:
Social Security Administration, Commissioner of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402 Social Security Benefits
Stoots v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner of
as 2:2013cv00044
Plaintiff:
Tammie E Stoots
Defendant:
Social Security Administration, Commissioner of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Hall v. Social Security Administration et al
as 3:2012cv01173
Plaintiff:
Ronald E. Hall
Defendant:
Social Security Administration and SSA-Email Notification
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Smith v. Social Security, Commissioner of
as 3:2012cv00238
Plaintiff:
Michael E. Smith
Defendant:
Social Security Administration, Commissioner of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Hatmaker v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner of
as 1:2012cv00145
Plaintiff:
Robert E Hatmaker
Defendant:
Social Security Administration, Commissioner of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Alsup v. Social Security Administration
as 3:2012cv00415
Plaintiff:
William E. Alsup
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
White v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner of (TV1)
as 3:2012cv00101
Plaintiff:
Kristy E White
Defendant:
Social Security Administration, Commissioner of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Nevils v. Social Security Administration
as 3:2012cv00188
Plaintiff:
Gene E. Nevils
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.