Supplemental Security Income Cases filed in Pennsylvania
Cases 31 - 40 of 60
BRANTLEY v. COLVIN We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2013cv06213
Plaintiff: DANIEL C. BRANTLEY
Defendant: CAROLYN W. COLVIN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Miller v. Colvin
as 3:2013cv02541
Plaintiff: Daniel K. Miller
Respondent: Carolyn Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
DANIELS v. COLVIN We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2013cv00287
Plaintiff: PASSION S. DANIELS
Defendant: CAROLYN W. COLVIN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
GENTRY v. SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2013cv00034
Plaintiff: DANIEL F. GENTRY
Defendant: SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 (g) Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Thomas v. Astrue We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2013cv00019
Plaintiff: Daniel D. Thomas
Defendant: Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
SOLLERA v. ASTRUE We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2012cv00320
Plaintiff: DANIEL SOLLERA
Defendant: MICHAEL J. ASTRUE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383 Review of HHS Decision
Herring v. Astrue
as 3:2012cv02211
Plaintiff: Danielle Herring
Defendant: Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
MCCLOSKEY v. ASTRUE We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2012cv01555
Plaintiff: DANIELLE LEE MCCLOSKEY
Defendant: MICHAEL J. ASTRUE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 (g) Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
DAVIS v. ASTRUE
as 2:2012cv04240
Plaintiff: DANIELLE DAVIS
Defendant: MICHAEL J. ASTRUE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
DANIELS v. ASTRUE
as 2:2012cv04070
Plaintiff: RODNEY DANIELS
Defendant: MICHAEL J. ASTRUE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?