Supplemental Security Income Cases filed in Pennsylvania
Cases 31 - 40 of 116
RSS Feed | View as table | Sort by last update
RENDOS v. SSA (INTERESTED PARTY / NEF) et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2017cv00803
Plaintiff: WILLIAM JOHN RENDOS, JR.
Defendant: CAROLYN W. COLVIN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
COPPER v. BERRYHILL We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2017cv00753
Plaintiff: THEODORE JOHN COPPER
Defendant: NANCY A. BERRYHILL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
LEIKHEIM v. BERRYHILL We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2017cv01011
Plaintiff: JOHN W. LEIKHEIM
Defendant: NANCY A. BERRYHILL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Kennedy v. Colvin We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2017cv00327
Plaintiff: John Kennedy
Defendant: Carolyn Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
SAWYER v. BERRYHILL We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2017cv00644
Plaintiff: JOHN SAWYER
Defendant: NANCY A. BERRYHILL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
GOGAL v. BERRYHILL We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2017cv00144
Plaintiff: JAMES JOHN GOGAL
Defendant: NANCY A. BERRYHILL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
LATHAM v. COLVIN We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2017cv00445
Plaintiff: JOHN LATHAM, JR.
Defendant: CAROLYN W. COLVIN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
JOHNSON v. COLVIN We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2016cv06160
Plaintiff: JOHN D. JOHNSON
Defendant: CAROLYN W. COLVIN
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601
Woodring v. Colvin We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2016cv02253
Plaintiff: John H. Woodring, Jr.
Defendant: Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Speese v. Colvin
as 1:2016cv01815
Plaintiff: John Gilbert Speese
Defendant: Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?