Cases 31 - 40 of 313
BURGESS v. ASTRUE
as 2:2012cv00252
Defendant:
MICHAEL J ASTRUE and SSA (Court Use Only)
Plaintiff:
CHARLES H BURGESS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
NORTON v. ASTRUE
as 1:2012cv01148
Defendant:
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE
Plaintiff:
NICHOLE NORTON
Miscellaneou:
SSA (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402 Social Security Benefits
PITTMAN v. ASTRUE
as 1:2012cv01128
Defendant:
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE
Plaintiff:
CHANA R. PITTMAN
Miscellaneou:
SSA (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402 Social Security Benefits
BRADLEY v. ASTRUE
as 1:2012cv01127
Defendant:
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE
Plaintiff:
DANNY T. BRADLEY
Miscellaneou:
SSA (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
HILL v. ASTRUE
as 1:2012cv01126
Defendant:
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE
Plaintiff:
GARY A. HILL
Miscellaneou:
SSA (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
ROWLEY v. ASTRUE
as 1:2012cv01125
Defendant:
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE
Plaintiff:
KEITH A. ROWLEY
Miscellaneou:
SSA (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402 Social Security Benefits
HASH v. ASTRUE
as 1:2012cv01077
Defendant:
MICHAEL J ASTRUE
Plaintiff:
DANIEL L HASH
Miscellaneou:
SSA (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
HILL v. ASTRUE
as 1:2012cv01060
Defendant:
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE
Plaintiff:
GENESIS M. HILL
Miscellaneou:
SSA (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
GARDNER v. ASTRUE
as 2:2012cv00217
Defendant:
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE
Plaintiff:
JENNIFER L GARDNER
Miscellaneou:
SSA (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
GRANT v. ASTRUE
as 1:2012cv01036
Defendant:
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE
Plaintiff:
STACIE L. GRANT
Miscellaneou:
SSA (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402 Social Security Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
