Cases 31 - 40 of 3,662
BABB v. O'MALLEY
as 2:2024cv00094
Plaintiff:
CHE R. BABB and CHE ROLAND BABB
Defendant:
MARTIN O'MALLEY and MARTIN J. O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Fields v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00127
Plaintiff:
Debbie L. Fields
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Not Yet Classified:
General Counsel SSA (Court use only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Weidenburner v. Social Security
as 4:2024cv00025
Plaintiff:
Jason E. Weidenburner
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Not Yet Classified:
General Counsel SSA (Court use only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
MEADOWS v. O'MALLEY
as 3:2024cv00059
Plaintiff:
CAMERON S. MEADOWS
Defendant:
MARTIN J. O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
STEPHENSON v. O'MALLEY
as 2:2024cv00088
Plaintiff:
CHARLES E. STEPHENSON
Defendant:
MARTIN J. O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
DEKEN v. O'MALLEY
as 3:2024cv00054
Plaintiff:
THOMAS R. DEKEN
Defendant:
MARTIN J. O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
HARDEN v. O'MALLEY
as 1:2024cv00451
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH R. HARDEN
Defendant:
MARTIN O'MALLEY and MARTIN J. O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
CARROLL v. O'MALLEY
as 1:2024cv00430
Plaintiff:
STORMI K. CARROLL
Defendant:
MARTIN J. O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
MINGS v. O'MALLEY
as 1:2024cv00421
Plaintiff:
REBECCA J. MINGS and REBECCA JANE MINGS
Defendant:
MARTIN O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
JONES v. O'MALLEY
as 4:2024cv00044
Plaintiff:
JOHN MARTIN JONES
Defendant:
MARTIN J O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
