Cases 61 - 70 of 313
LINCOLN v. ASTRUE
as 1:2012cv00707
Defendant:
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE
Plaintiff:
JENNIFER L. LINCOLN
Miscellaneou:
SSA (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
BURTON v. ASTRUE
as 1:2012cv00676
Defendant:
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE
Plaintiff:
KEVIN BURTON
Miscellaneou:
SSA (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383 Review of HHS Decision
HARRISON v. ASTRUE
as 1:2012cv00679
Defendant:
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE
Plaintiff:
ROBERT THOMAS HARRISON
Miscellaneou:
SSA (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
TRUSTY v. ASTRUE
as 2:2012cv00121
Defendant:
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE
Miscellaneou:
SSA (Court Use Only)
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL T. TRUSTY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
AGUILAR v. ASTRUE
as 1:2012cv00664
Plaintiff:
LEYLA O. AGUILAR
Defendant:
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE
Miscellaneou:
SSA (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402 Social Security Benefits
TAUBER v. ASTRUE
as 2:2012cv00119
Defendant:
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE
Miscellaneou:
SSA (Court Use Only)
Plaintiff:
PATRICIA A. TAUBER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
T.D.C. v. ASTRUE
as 1:2012cv00605
Defendant:
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE
Plaintiff:
T. D. C.
Miscellaneou:
SSA (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
S.L.J. v. ASTRUE
as 1:2012cv00606
Defendant:
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE
Plaintiff:
S. L. J.
Miscellaneou:
SSA (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
EISENSHANK v. ASTRUE
as 1:2012cv00601
Defendant:
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE
Plaintiff:
SEASON EISENSHANK
Miscellaneou:
SSA (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
RICHARDS v. ASTRUE
as 1:2012cv00602
Defendant:
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE
Plaintiff:
REBECCA M. RICHARDS
Miscellaneou:
SSA (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402 Social Security Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
