Supplemental Security Income Cases filed in Pennsylvania
Cases 1 - 10 of 71
CRESSLEY v. KIJAKAZI
as 2:2023cv01465
Plaintiff: JORDAN C. CRESSLEY and JORDAN M. CRESSLEY
Defendant: KILOLO KIJAKAZI and SSA (INTERESTED PARTY / NEF)
KAUER v. KIJAKAZI We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2022cv02580
Plaintiff: JAMES C KAUER
Defendant: KILOLO KIJAKAZI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
LONG v. KIJAKAZI
as 2:2022cv01402
Plaintiff: KELLI C LONG
Defendant: Comm'r of SSA KILOLO KIJAKAZI and KILOLO KIJAKAZI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
GONGON v. KIJAKAZI We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2022cv00384
Plaintiff: BENJAMIN C GONGON
Defendant: Acting Comm'r o KILOLO KIJAKAZI and KILOLO KIJAKAZI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Watkins v. Kijakazi We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2022cv00037
Plaintiff: Jennifer C. Watkins
Defendant: Andrew Saul and Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
MIKNIS v. SAUL We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2021cv02217
Defendant: ANDREW SAUL
Plaintiff: MARIA C MIKNIS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
YELVERTON v. SAUL
as 2:2021cv00934
Plaintiff: MARIA C. YELVERTON
Defendant: ANDREW SAUL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
ROSE v. UNKOWN SOCIAL SECURITY AGENT et al
as 5:2019cv06018
Interested Party: SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Defendant: ANDREW C. LYNCH, SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION MID-ATLANTIC PROGRAM SERVICE CENTER, UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT and others
Plaintiff: JAMES EDWARD ROSE, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402
Watkins v. Saul
as 1:2019cv01632
Defendant: Andrew Saul
Plaintiff: Jennifer C. Watkins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Burke v. Berryhill We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2019cv00574
Defendant: Nancy A. Berryhill
Plaintiff: Diane C. Burke
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?