Cases 1 - 10 of 102
Rooks v. Commissioner Social Security
as 3:2024cv00900
Plaintiff:
David Rooks
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Thomas v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2024cv00068
Plaintiff:
David Thomas
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Russell v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2023cv03614
Interested Party:
SSA
Plaintiff:
David M. Russell
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Patuwo v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 5:2023cv01703
Plaintiff:
David Feng Patuwo
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Collingsworth v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2023cv00633
Plaintiff:
David R. Collingsworth
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Hargett v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 5:2022cv01774
Plaintiff:
David R. Hargett
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision
Cavens v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2022cv00560
Plaintiff:
David Edgar Cavens
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Kellogg v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
as 4:2022cv01640
Plaintiff:
Chad David Kellogg
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 425 Social Security Benefits
Arsham v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 5:2022cv01465
Plaintiff:
David Michael Arsham
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 425 Social Security Benefits
Hall v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 4:2021cv01154
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
David M. Hall
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 206
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
