Supplemental Security Income Cases filed in Indiana
Walter v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00019
Plaintiff: Nathan T Walter
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security and General Counsel SSA (Court use only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
HALE v. KIJAKAZI
as 4:2023cv00158
Plaintiff: NATHAN C. HALE
Defendant: KILOLO KIJAKAZI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
BROWN v. KIJAKAZI
as 1:2023cv01131
Plaintiff: NATHAN E. BROWN
Defendant: KILOLO KIJAKAZI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
Parrish v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2019cv00040
Defendant: Acting Commissioner NANCY A. BERRYHILL and Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff: Nathan Wesley Parrish
Undetermined: SSA (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Hill v. Commissioner of Social Security We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2018cv00582
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff: Nathan Hill and Nathan L Hill
Undetermined: SSA (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Lear v. Commissioner of Social Security We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2017cv00064
Plaintiff: Nathan W Lear
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Miscellaneous_party: SSA (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
BALAY v. COLVIN
as 1:2016cv01772
Plaintiff: NATHAN P BALAY
Defendant: CAROLYN W. COLVIN
Miscellaneou: SSA (Court Use Only) and USM (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
Dawson v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2012cv00759
Plaintiff: Nathan J Dawson
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Miscellaneous_party: SSA (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
WILSON v. ASTRUE
as 1:2008cv00111
Plaintiff: NATHAN SAMUEL WILSON
Defendant: MICHAEL J. ASTRUE
Miscellaneou: SSA (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?