Cases 1 - 10 of 49
Thomas v. Social Security
as 4:2023cv12102
Plaintiff:
Alecia Thomas
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
(Court Use Only) SSA Notification - Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Jones v. Social Security, Commissioner of
as 5:2023cv11566
Plaintiff:
Thomas Jones
Defendant:
Social Security, Commissioner of
Interested Party:
(Court Use Only) SSA Notification - Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Drake v. Social Security, Commissioner of
as 2:2022cv12244
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Thomas Drake
Defendant:
Social Security, Commissioner of
Le Moine v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2022cv00103
Plaintiff:
Thomas A Le Moine and Thomas Le Moine
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi and Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of Social Security Decision (SSID)
Thomas v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2021cv00116
Plaintiff:
Dennis R Thomas and Dennis Ray Thomas
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Verile v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2020cv01015
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
Thomas M. Verile, Sr.
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Censke v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2020cv00180
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Plaintiff:
Thomas A. Censke
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Bush v. Saul
as 2:2020cv11893
Defendant:
Andrew Saul
Plaintiff:
Thomas Bush
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Stanley v. Commissioner
as 2:2020cv11868
Plaintiff:
Thomas David Stanley
Defendant:
Social Security Commissioner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
