Cases 71 - 80 of 167
LUM v. ASTRUE
as 1:2011cv00313
Defendant:
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE
Plaintiff:
CHRISTINA L. LUM
Miscellaneou:
SSA (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
DOWNS v. ASTRUE
as 1:2011cv00289
Defendant:
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE
Plaintiff:
PAULA DOWNS
Miscellaneou:
SSA (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
SAVAGE v. ASTRUE
as 1:2011cv00151
Defendant:
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE
Plaintiff:
LISA A. SAVAGE
Miscellaneou:
SSA (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
CRITES v. ASTRUE
as 1:2011cv00114
Defendant:
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE
Plaintiff:
TESSIN CRITES
Miscellaneou:
SSA (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
PATTON v. ASTRUE
as 1:2011cv00084
Defendant:
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE
Plaintiff:
TERRY R. PATTON
Miscellaneou:
SSA (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
BROWN et al v. ASTRUE
as 1:2010cv01743
Defendant:
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE
Plaintiff:
GLORIA BROWN
Miscellaneou:
SSA (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
HOYD v. ASTRUE
as 1:2010cv01625
Defendant:
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE
Plaintiff:
DIANA K. HOYD
Miscellaneou:
SSA (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
BRUMMETT v. ASTRUE
as 1:2010cv01540
Defendant:
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE
Plaintiff:
VERONICA D. BRUMMETT
Miscellaneou:
SSA (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
STEPRO v. ASTRUE
as 4:2010cv00149
Defendant:
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE
Miscellaneou:
SSA (Court Use Only)
Plaintiff:
KELLY ANN STEPRO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
REED v. ASTRUE et al
as 1:2010cv01465
Defendant:
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY P. REED
Miscellaneou:
SSA (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
