Cases 81 - 90 of 167
FREEMAN v. ASTRUE
as 1:2010cv01431
Defendant:
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE
Plaintiff:
BEN E. FREEMAN
Miscellaneou:
SSA (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
JONES v. ASTRUE
as 1:2010cv01258
Defendant:
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE
Plaintiff:
KIMBERLY A. JONES
Miscellaneou:
SSA (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
GARY v. ASTRUE
as 1:2010cv01246
Defendant:
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE
Plaintiff:
GINA M GARY
Miscellaneou:
SSA (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
LEISURE v. ASTRUE
as 1:2010cv01205
Defendant:
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE
Plaintiff:
JONATHAN L LEISURE
Miscellaneou:
SSA (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
SCHAEFER v. ASTRUE
as 1:2010cv01166
Defendant:
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE
Plaintiff:
RONALD TRACY SCHAEFER
Miscellaneou:
SSA (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
BEGLEY v. ASTRUE
as 1:2010cv01113
Defendant:
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE
Plaintiff:
DWAYNE BEGLEY
Miscellaneou:
SSA (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
LEWIS v. ASTRUE
as 1:2010cv01014
Defendant:
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE
Plaintiff:
JAMES H. LEWIS
Miscellaneou:
SSA (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
ASHBY v. ASTRUE
as 1:2010cv00938
Plaintiff:
BRENDA SUE ASHBY
Defendant:
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE
Miscellaneou:
SSA (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
RABE v. ASTRUE
as 1:2010cv00860
Defendant:
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE
Plaintiff:
DAWN N. RABE
Miscellaneou:
SSA (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
ELLIS v. ASTRUE
as 1:2010cv00841
Defendant:
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE
Plaintiff:
NICHOLAS ELLIS
Miscellaneou:
SSA (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
