Cases 31 - 40 of 212
United States of America v. Ricks
as 0:2021cv00379
Defendant:
Terry J. Ricks
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7401
United States of America v. Montain et al
as 0:2020cv02037
Defendant:
Judith M. Montain and Paul D. Montain
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7401
United States of America v. Ploog
as 0:2020cv01258
Defendant:
Kurt Ploog
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7402
United States of America v. Midtling
as 0:2020cv00903
Defendant:
James Midtling
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7401
Kaeding v. United States of America
as 0:2020cv00720
Plaintiff:
Harold B. Kaeding
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7422
MJWBL, LLC v. United States of America
as 0:2020cv00616
Plaintiff:
MJWBL, LLC
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2410
United States of America v. Lewis et al
as 0:2020cv00363
Defendant:
Portfolio Recovery Associates, LLC, Minnesota Department of Revenue, Sarah R. Lewis and others
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7401
Mendota Valley Amusement, Inc. v. United States of America
as 0:2019cv03155
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Mendota Valley Amusement Inc.
Defendant:
United States Of America and Its Department of Treasury and United States of America
Plaintiff:
Mendota Valley Amusement, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7422
Mendota Valley Amusement, Inc. v. United States Of America and Its Department of Treasury
as 0:2019cv03154
Defendant:
United States Of America and Its Department of Treasury
Plaintiff:
Mendota Valley Amusement, Inc.
United States of America v. Balega et al
as 0:2019cv02959
Defendant:
Tina Balega, Peoples Small Loan Company, Paul S. Balega and others
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7403
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
