Cases 101 - 110 of 189
Dominguez v. Select Portfolio Servicing Inc
as 1:2017cv00497
Plaintiff:
Miguel Dominguez
Defendant:
Select Portfolio Servicing Inc
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Eckberg v. Select Portfolio Servicing Company, Inc.
as 1:2017cv00185
Plaintiff:
Keith S. Eckberg
Defendant:
Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 2601
GAVIN v. TRANS UNION LLC et al
as 2:2017cv00186
Plaintiff:
BARBARA LEAH GAVIN
Defendant:
TRANS UNION LLC , EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, INC., EQUIFAX INFORMATION SERVICES LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Jones v. Select Portfolio Servicing Inc.
as 9:2017cv80037
Plaintiff:
Malcolm Jones
Defendant:
Select Portfolio Servicing Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
MCCOY v. Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc.
as 9:2017cv80008
Plaintiff:
ALAN MCCOY
Defendant:
Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Pembroke v. Trans Union, LLC et al
as 1:2016cv03194
Plaintiff:
John Pembroke
Defendant:
Trans Union, LLC, Equifax Information Services, LLC, Experian Information Solutions, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Grant v. Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc
as 0:2016cv62966
Plaintiff:
Renade Grant
Defendant:
Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Scott, Jr. et al v. Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc.
as 1:2016cv02859
Plaintiff:
Thomas W. Scott, Jr. and Joyce Scott
Defendant:
Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Sanchez v. Select Portfolio Servicing Inc
as 1:2016cv09953
Plaintiff:
Cynthia Sanchez
Defendant:
Select Portfolio Servicing Inc
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Laura Saterbak v. National Default Servicing Cor, et al
as 16-56345
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LAURA D. SATERBAK
Defendant - Appellee:
NATIONAL DEFAULT SERVICING CORPORATION, SELECT PORTFOLIO SERVICING, INC., JP MORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A. and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
