Cases 121 - 130 of 539
Shanahan et al v. Lee Law Offices et al
as 8:2018cv00129
Plaintiff:
Molli M. Larsen and Timothy J. Shanahan, Jr.
Defendant:
Dennis P. Lee, Lee Law Offices and Jimmy Newton
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Lucas v. National Auto Sales, Inc.
as 4:2018cv03028
Plaintiff:
Cody Lucas
Defendant:
National Auto Sales, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601 Truth in Lending
Womack v. United States Postal Service et al
as 8:2018cv00040
Defendant:
Sylvia Harmon and United States Postal Service
Plaintiff:
Lecia Womack
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Schinco et al v. Schinco
as 8:2018cv00027
Plaintiff:
Alexis Sarmiento and James J. Schinco
Defendant:
Amy Schinco
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 2520 Interception of Electronic Communication
2018 Duplicate Attorney Admission Certificates
as 8:2018mc00003
In Re:
2018 Duplicate Attorney Admission Certificates
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Juarez v. Walker Manufacturing Company
as 8:2017cv00497
Movant:
Rodney L. Benson
Plaintiff:
Elder Juarez
Defendant:
Walker Manufacturing Company
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Omaha Exposition and Racing vs. Nebraska State Racing Commission
as 8:2017cv00496
Defendant:
Nebraska State Racing Commission
Plaintiff:
Omaha Exposition and Racing, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Boko v. Credit Bureau Services, Inc.
as 8:2017cv03150
Plaintiff:
Kareena Boko
Defendant:
Credit Bureau Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Boko v. Credit Bureau Services, Inc.
as 4:2017cv03150
Plaintiff:
Kareena Boko
Defendant:
Credit Bureau Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Ames v. Global Receivables Solutions, Inc.
as 8:2017cv00395
Plaintiff:
Pat Ames
Defendant:
Global Receivables Solutions, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
