Other Statutory Actions Cases filed in Pennsylvania
Cases 11 - 20 of 20
SCRENCI v. SCRENCI
as 2:2011cv07487
Plaintiff: FRANK J. SCRENCI
Defendant: SARAH H. SCRENCI
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Archbold v. Executive Credit Bureau, Inc.
as 3:2011cv00808
Plaintiff: Sarah Archbold
Defendant: Executive Credit Bureau, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
ARCHBOLD v. EXXON MOBILE CORPORATION
as 2:2011cv01044
Plaintiff: SARAH ARCHBOLD
Defendant: EXXON MOBILE CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1693
ARCHBOLD v. SPENCER SAVINGS BANK et al
as 2:2011cv00412
Plaintiff: SARAH ARCHBOLD
Defendant: SPENCER SAVINGS BANK , JOHN DOES 1-10 and XYZ CORPORATIONS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
ARCHBOLD v. PROVIDENT FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC. et al
as 2:2011cv00315
Plaintiff: SARAH ARCHBOLD
Defendant: PROVIDENT FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC. , JOHN DOES 1-10 and XYZ CORPORATIONS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
SHAFFER et al v. MRS ASSOCIATES, INC.
as 2:2011cv00052
Plaintiff: KAILYN SHAFFER and SARAH SILVIS
Defendant: MRS ASSOCIATES, INC.
Mediator: PATRICIA L. DODGE
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
ARCHBOLD v. EXXON MOBIL CORPORATION
as 2:2010cv02696
Plaintiff: SARAH ARCHBOLD
Defendant: EXXON MOBIL CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1693
SIMSEK v. NAPOLITANO et al
as 2:2009cv03248
Plaintiff: OSMAN SIMSEK
Defendant: JANET NAPOLITANO, ERIC HOLDER, MICHAEL AYTES and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Type: Other Statutes None
HANAS v. AFNI, INC.
as 1:2008cv00126
Plaintiff: SARAH HANAS
Defendant: AFNI, INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
SMITH v. NCB MANAGEMENT SERVICES, INC et al
as 2:2007cv00068
Plaintiff: ROBERT D. SMITH
Defendant: NCB MANAGEMENT SERVICES, INC, NCB MANAGEMENT SERVICES, INC, SARAH POTTER and others
Mediator: JOHN H. PERKINS
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?