Cases 11 - 20 of 41
United Parcel Service, Inc. v. Anthem, Inc.
as 1:2016mi00086
Movant:
United Parcel Service, Inc.
Respondent:
Anthem, Inc.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. ANTHEM, INC. et al
as 1:2016mc02126
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
ANTHEM, INC. and CIGNA CORP.
Cause Of Action: Motion to Compel
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. ANTHEM, INC. et al
as 1:2016mc02052
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
ANTHEM, INC. and CIGNA CORP.
Cause Of Action: Motion to Compel
United States of America v. Anthem, Inc. et al
as 6:2016mc00047
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Anthem, Inc. and Cigna Corp.
Cause Of Action: Motion to Compel
Crane v. Anthem, Inc.
as 5:2016cv01866
Plaintiff:
Shawn Crane
Defendant:
Anthem, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Ansah-Dawson v. Anthem, Inc.
as 5:2016cv01511
Plaintiff:
William Ansah-Dawson and C. Wheelwright
Defendant:
Anthem Inc and Anthem Insurance Companies, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Holguin et al v. The Anthem Companies, Inc.
as 5:2015cv04460
Plaintiff:
Jessica Holguin , Kimberly Kos-Williams and Gary Lasneski
Defendant:
The Anthem Companies, Inc., Anthem Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Vermont, Anthem, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Shiltz et al v. Anthem, Inc. et al
as 5:2015cv02892
Plaintiff:
Lisa Shiltz , Rianna Ooten and Jennifer Ooten
Defendant:
Anthem Inc, The Anthem Companies, Inc., Anthem Health & Life Insurance Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Peterman v. Anthem, Inc. et al
as 5:2015cv02830
Plaintiff:
Wilma J Peterman
Defendant:
Anthem Inc , Anthem Companies, Inc. and Anthem Health Plans, Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Leniski v. Anthem, Inc. et al
as 5:2015cv02992
Plaintiff:
Kathryn Leniski
Defendant:
Anthem, Inc., The Anthem Companies, Inc. and Blue Cross of California dba Anthem Blue Cross
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
