Cases 11 - 20 of 28
Schopmann v. Midland Funding, LLC et al (TV2)
as 3:2013cv00477
Plaintiff:
Daniel Schopmann
Defendant:
Midland Funding, LLC, Midland Credit Management, Inc. and Hosto & Buchan, PLLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Lail et al v. Citimortgage, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv00185
Plaintiff:
John Daniel Lail and Kathy R Lail
Defendant:
Citimortgage, Inc. , Wilson & Associates, PLLC and Kristin A Camp
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Daniel v. ProCollect, Inc.
as 3:2013cv00571
Plaintiff:
Ashly Daniel
Defendant:
ProCollect, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Morley v. Price et al
as 3:2012cv01067
Plaintiff:
Brad Morley
Defendant:
Danielle Price and Michael Price
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Johnson v. Memphis City Schools et al
as 2:2012cv02140
Plaintiff:
Tommie Johnson
Defendant:
Memphis City Schools, Patricia A. Toarmina, Celia Moore and others
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1400
Smith v. SSS Secure Holdings, LLC
as 3:2012cv00057
Plaintiff:
Daniel Smith
Defendant:
SSS Secure Holdings, LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
Smith v. Chase Bank USA, N.A.
as 3:2011cv01055
Defendant:
Chase Bank USA, N.A.
Plaintiff:
Daniel Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Adams et al v. MGC Mortgage, Inc. et al
as 3:2011cv00809
Plaintiff:
Daniel R. Adams and Erika G. Adams
Defendant:
MGC Mortgage, Inc. , Dovenmuehle Mortgage, Inc. and LLP Mortgage Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Cuadras v. Aspen National Financial, Inc. et al
as 2:2011cv00119
Plaintiff:
Althea L Cuadras
Defendant:
Aspen National Financial, Inc. , John Brown and Casey Daniels
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Samples v. Global Credit & Collection Inc. et al
as 3:2011cv00034
Plaintiff:
Stephen Samples
Defendant:
Global Credit & Collection Inc. , Global Credit & Collection Corporation, Martin Sugar and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
