Cases 11 - 20 of 30
Gallaga v. Zavala Ramirez
as 4:2019cv00440
Defendant:
Jose Roberto Zavala Ramirez
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Jaramillo Gallaga
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 11603
Cunningham v. Niagara Restitution Services, Inc. et al
as 4:2018cv00682
Defendant:
Niagara Restitution Services, Inc., Yamal Ramirez and John/Jane Does 1-5
Plaintiff:
Craig Cunningham
Garcia et al v. MCA Financial Group Limited
as 4:2018mc02140
Plaintiff:
William Shelton, Aaron Dunning, James Stephens and others
Respondent:
MidCap Financial Trust and MidCap Funding X Trust
Defendant:
MCA Financial Group Limited
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Adams v. Alcolac, Inc. et al
as 3:2018cv00185
Defendant:
Alcolac, Inc. and Rhodia Inc.
Intervenor_plaintiff:
William J. Adams , Ray Aikens, Sr. , Kathleen J Aikens and others
Cause Of Action: 88 U.S.C. § 8888
Ramirez v. Magistrate Judge Nowak
as 5:2016mc00322
Respondent:
Magistrate Judge Nowak
Petitioner:
Ana Marie Ramirez
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Ramirez et al v. Monsanto Company et al
as 7:2014cv00582
Plaintiff:
Luis Ruben Ramirez , Raul Alberto Ramirez , Ricardo Gomez and others
Defendant:
Monsanto Company, Alfredo Garcia, Jr. and Rosa Trevino
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Mondragon v. Vera Ramirez
as 1:2014cv00059
Petitioner:
Rogelio Escobedo Mondragon
Respondent:
Linda Ivonne Vera Ramirez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 11603 (b) Appl. for Return of Child Pursuant to Hague Convention
In Re: Ramirez
as 2:2013mc00095
Respondent:
In Re: Ramirez
Petitioner:
USA
Cause Of Action: Contempt Proceedings
In Re Saida Lizeth Nunez Ramirez
as 7:2013mc00746
Petitioner:
Saida Lizeth Nunez Ramirez
Cause Of Action: 88 U.S.C. § 8888
Herrera Hazas v. Ramirez Ruiz
as 5:2013cv00445
Petitioner:
Benjamin Herrera Hazas
Respondent:
Gabriela Ramirez Ruiz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 11603 (b) Appl. for Return of Child Pursuant to Hague Convention
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
