Other Statutory Actions Cases filed in Arizona
Cases 21 - 30 of 41
Ball v. Blunt et al
as 2:2014cv00248
Plaintiff: Dennis Andrew Ball
Defendant: Amanda Blunt and Arizona Supreme Court
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Tippins v. TransUnion LLC
as 2:2013cv01776
Plaintiff: Andrew David Tippins
Defendant: TransUnion LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Ball v. Blunt et al
as 2:2013cv01315
Plaintiff: Dennis Andrew Ball
Defendant: Amanda Blunt and Arizona Supreme Court
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Miller v. Butler et al
as 4:2013mc00007
Plaintiff: Andrew S Miller
Defendant: Dennis Butler and Universal Payment Processing
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Peters v. Coface Collections North America Incorporated We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2012cv02600
Plaintiff: Andrew Peters
Defendant: Coface Collections North America Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Collier et al v. Gurstel Chargo PA We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2012cv02161
Defendant: Gurstel Chargo PA
Plaintiff: Michael Andrew Collier and Kim Collier-Dingman
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
United States of America v. Andrews
as 2:2012mc00058
Petitioner: United States of America
Respondent: James A Andrews, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7402
Joe Hand Promotions Incorporated v. Waits et al
as 2:2011cv02257
Plaintiff: Joe Hand Promotions Incorporated
Defendant: Andrew Waits, Laurent Loison and Relaaax LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0605
Parsons v. Michael Andrews & Associates LLC
as 2:2011cv02161
Plaintiff: Thomas Parsons
Defendant: Michael Andrews & Associates LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Armstrong v. Shirvell
as 2:2011mc00109
Plaintiff: Christopher Armstrong
Counter_defendant: Christopher Armstrong
Defendant: Andrew Shirvell
Counter_claimant: Andrew Shirvell
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?