Cases 21 - 30 of 33
RENE v. G.F. FISHERS, INC. et al
as 1:2011cv00514
Defendant:
DANIEL S. AUSTAD, DEAN AUSTAD, REBECCA SUSAN AUSTAD and others
Plaintiff:
LISA M. RENE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Cerajewski v. Aegis Receivables Management Inc
as 2:2010cv00414
Plaintiff:
Daniel Cerajewski
Defendant:
Aegis Receivables Management Inc
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Cerajewski v. Assetcare Inc
as 2:2010cv00413
Plaintiff:
Daniel Cerajewski
Defendant:
Assetcare Inc
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Mirro v. Hurwich et al
as 2:2010cv00202
Plaintiff:
John A Mirro, Jr
Defendant:
Daniel B Hurwich, Sharon A Harig, Kumar Venkat and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Doud v. Credit Collections USA LLC
as 2:2009cv00042
Plaintiff:
Danielle Doud
Defendant:
Credit Collections USA LLC
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Martin v. Puckett Auctions et al
as 1:2008cv00233
Plaintiff:
Daniel F Martin
Defendant:
Puckett Auctions, Wilber Puckett and Brad Puckett
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Gultry et al v. Daniels et al
as 3:2008cv00410
Plaintiff:
Lula M Gultry, Spencer L Jones Jr, James Vlasos and others
Defendant:
Mitchell E Daniels, Mitchell E Daniels, E Mitchell Roob and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
TRUAX v. THE STATE OF INDIANA et al
as 1:2008cv01011
Plaintiff:
DALE A. TRUAX
Defendant:
THE STATE OF INDIANA, MITCHELL E. DANIELS, JR., THE INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
RANKIN v. DANIELS & NORELLI, P.C.
as 1:2008cv00639
Plaintiff:
MICHELLE S. RANKIN, MICHELLE S. RANKIN and MICHELLE S. RANKIN
Defendant:
DANIELS & NORELLI, P.C.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Pramuk v. Montalbano-Phelps et al
as 2:2008cv00103
Plaintiff:
Susan Pramuk
Defendant:
Lori Montalbano-Phelps, Cheryl Montalbano-Rahmany, Arthur R Pramuk and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
