Cases 21 - 30 of 56
Chowdhury v. Midland Credit Management, Inc.
as 1:2019cv03427
Plaintiff:
Nafiz Chowdhury
Defendant:
Midland Credit Management, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Downs v. Midland Credit Management, Inc.
as 5:2019cv00404
Plaintiff:
Justin Downs
Defendant:
Midland Credit Management, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Telephone Consumer Protection Act
McLean v. Midland Credit Management, Inc.
as 1:2019cv02329
Plaintiff:
Mark McLean
Defendant:
Midland Credit Management, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
HAMADOU v. Midland Credit Management, Inc.
as 1:2019cv05522
Plaintiff:
MOSSI HAMADOU
Defendant:
Midland Credit Management, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Milon v. Midland Credit Management, Inc.
as 1:2019cv03330
Plaintiff:
Nishat T Milon
Defendant:
Midland Credit Management, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Seferaj v. Midland Credit Management, Inc.
as 1:2019cv03263
Plaintiff:
Minire Seferaj
Defendant:
Midland Credit Management, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Tam v. Midland Credit Management, Inc.
as 1:2019cv01307
Plaintiff:
Nikk Tam
Defendant:
Midland Credit Management, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Hamra et al v. Midland Credit Management, Inc.
as 1:2018cv06064
Defendant:
Midland Credit Management, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Dina Hamra and Subi Hamra
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Schonfeld v. Midland Credit Management, Inc. et al
as 7:2018cv07317
Plaintiff:
Eidl Schonfeld, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated; and Eidl Schonfeld
Defendant:
John Does 1-25 and Midland Credit Management, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Rosado v. Midland Credit Management, Inc.
as 1:2017cv10140
Plaintiff:
Jorge Rosado
Defendant:
Midland Credit Management, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
