Cases 21 - 30 of 40
In Re: Lenovo Adware Litigation
as 5:2015md02624
Plaintiff:
Sterling International Consulting Group , David Hunter , Marie Wilson and others
Defendant:
Lenovo (United States) Inc. , Lenovo Group Limited, Superfish, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
In Re: Lenovo Adware Litigation
as 4:2015md02624
Plaintiff:
Jayne Constanzo, Susan Webster-Shultz, Michelle Behren and others
Defendant:
Lenovo Inc., Lenovo Group Limited and Superfish, Inc.
In Re:
In Re: Lenovo Adware Litigation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Phan v. M&T Bank
as 1:2015cv00681
Plaintiff:
Tristina Phan
Defendant:
M&T Bank
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
In the Matter of the Tax Liabilities of Hong V. Pham and Khanhdieu T. Hoang
as 5:2014mc80134
Petitioner:
United States Of America
Respondent:
Hong V. Phan and Khanhdieu T. Hoang
Phan et al v. Retrieval-Masters Creditors Bureau, Inc.
as 3:2014cv00109
Plaintiff:
Tuyen Phan and Michael Phan
Defendant:
Retrieval-Masters Creditors Bureau, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Phan v. Credit Control Services, Inc.
as 3:2014cv00083
Plaintiff:
Michael Phan
Defendant:
Credit Control Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Restrictions on Use of Telephone Equipment
Phan v. Covergent Outsourcing, Inc.
as 3:2014cv00084
Plaintiff:
Michael Phan
Defendant:
Covergent Outsourcing, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Restrictions on Use of Telephone Equipment
Paul Newson v. Bruce Marrs, et al
as 13-57112
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PAUL NEWSON
Defendant - Appellee:
BRUCE F. MARRS, WADE T. OLSEN, C. T. PHAN and others
Paul Newson v. Bruce F Marrs et al
as 2:2013cv07571
Defendant:
Leroy Baca, Bruce F Marrs, Karen Olfin and others
Plaintiff:
Paul Newson
Phan v. Association Financial Services, L.C. et al
as 3:2013cv01032
Plaintiff:
Michael Phan
Defendant:
Association Financial Services, L.C. and Does 1 Through 10
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
