Cases 21 - 25 of 25
Edgar Bayas v. Zar Realty Management Corp.
as 11-392
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Edgar C. Bayas
Defendant:
Zar Realty Management Corp.,, Verizon New York Inc., Colliers Aba, Inc. and others
Defendant - Appellant:
City of New York, AMEC Construction Management, Inc., AMEC Earth & Environmental, Inc. and others
In Re Combined World Trade
as 10-1378
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Edgar C. Bayas
Defendant:
Zar Realty Management Corp.,, Verizon New York Inc., Colliers Aba, Inc. and others
Defendant - Appellant:
City of New York, Amec Construction Management, Inc., AMEC Earth & Environmental, Inc. and others
Cevallos v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2008cv03494
Plaintiff:
Ernesto Cevallos and Ernesto Cevallos
Defendant:
The City of New York, The Port Authority of New York and New Jersey, AMEC Construction Management,Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 49 U.S.C. § 40101 Air Trans. Safety and Sys. Stabilization Act
CAMPANELLO v. PORT AUTHORITY OF NEW YORK AND NEW JERSEY et al
as 2:2007cv04929
Plaintiff:
VINCENT CAMPANELLO
Defendant:
PORT AUTHORITY OF NEW YORK AND NEW JERSEY, JOSEPH STITZ, JR., JUAN GARCIA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Injunctive/Declarato
Aegis Insurance Services, Inc. et al v. 7 World Trade Center Company, L.P. et al
as 1:2004cv07272
Defendant:
Syska & Hennessy Group, Inc., AMEC Construction Management Inc., 7 World Trade Center Company, L.P. and others
Plaintiff:
Aegis Insurance Services, Inc., Liberty Insurance Underwriters, Inc., National Union Insurance Company of Pittsburgh and others
Intervenor Plaintiff:
Intervenors The WTC Plaintiffs
3Rd Party Plaintiff:
7 World Trade Company, L.P.
Alternative Dispute Resolution (Adr) Provider:
Johnson Controls World Services Inc. and The Port Authority of New York and New Jersey
Cross Defendant:
Swanke Hayden Connell Arche
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Other
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
