Cases 31 - 40 of 44
Schaefer v. Roestel et al
as 2:2012cv10820
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Eric Schaefer
Defendant:
Marnie Roestel, Kirt Yats, Mary E Roy and others
United States of America v. Peters
as 5:2011mc51027
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Lance Richard Peters
Fisher, et al v. Benzik, et al
as 1:2011cv00242
Plaintiff:
Randi Fisher and Jason Fisher
Defendant:
Mary Ellen Benzik, Marti J. Peters, Family Health Center of Battle Creek and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
United States of America v. Hendrickson
as 2:2010mc51307
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Peter Hendrickson
Michigan Surgery Investment, LLC et al v. Arman et al
as 2:2009cv14656
Plaintiff:
Michigan Surgery Investment, LLC, VEI - Michigan, Inc., Visionary Enterprises, Inc. and others
Defendant:
Mohammed Arman, Carl T. Bergren, Ricardo D. Borrego and others
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Type:
Other Statutes
Anibal v. Securities and Exchange Commission et al
as 2:2009cv12587
Plaintiff:
Philip Anibal
Defendant:
Securities and Exchange Commission, Peter Roor, Ronald L. Templin and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1335 Interpleader Action
Type:
Other Statutes
Mann
as 2:2008cv13050
Plaintiff:
George Peter Mann
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Bik v. Chertoff et al
as 1:2007cv01072
Plaintiff:
Van Lian Bik
Defendant:
Michael Chertoff, Emilio T. Gonzalez and Peter D. Keisler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Marouf v. Chavez et al
as 1:2007cv01021
Petitioner:
Rahma Mohammad Marouf
Respondent:
Maria R. Chavez, Emilio T. Gonzalez, Michael Chertoff and others
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1447 Hearings on Denials of Applications for Naturalization
Hama v. Chavez et al
as 1:2007cv01019
Petitioner:
Prshang Hama
Respondent:
Maria R. Chavez, Emilio T. Gonzalez, Michael Chertoff and others
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1447 Hearings on Denials of Applications for Naturalization
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
