Cases 51 - 60 of 107
Earls et al v. Home Depot, Inc. et al
as 3:2014cv04315
Plaintiff:
Shonna Earls and John Holt, Sr.
Defendant:
Home Depot, Inc. and Home Depot U.S.A., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Rivera v. Toyota Motor North America, Inc.
as 3:2014cv04052
Plaintiff:
Juan Carlos Rivera
Defendant:
Toyota Motor North America, Inc. and Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301
Taherian v. Toyota Motor Sales U.S.A., Inc. et al
as 3:2014cv01884
Defendant:
Toyota Motor Sales U.S.A., Inc. and Toyota Motor Corporation
Plaintiff:
Babak Taherian
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Philip Kirsopp et al v. Yamaha Motor Co., Ltd. et al
as 8:2014cv00496
Plaintiff:
James R Krapf, William Kratz, William Neff and others
Defendant:
Yamaha Motor Co., Ltd. and Yamaha Motor Corporation, U.S.A.
Belli v. Nestle U.S.A, Inc.
as 5:2014cv00283
Plaintiff:
Marianna Belli
Defendant:
Nestle U.S.A, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
William Aviles Hardwood Floors v. JTEKT Corporation et al
as 5:2014cv00114
Plaintiff:
William Aviles Hardwood Floors
Defendant:
JTEKT Corporation, Koyo Corporation of U.S.A., Nachi-Fujikoshi Corp. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Smith v. LG Electronics U.S.A., Inc. et al
as 4:2013cv04361
Plaintiff:
Laury Smith
Defendant:
LG Electronics U.S.A., Inc. and Sears Holdings Corp.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301
Patricia Nance, et al. v. Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A., Inc., et al.
as 2:2013mc00320
Plaintiff:
Patricia Nance
Defendant:
Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A., Inc.
Patricia Nance v. Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A., Inc.
as 2:2013mc00321
Plaintiff:
Patricia Nance
Defendant:
Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A., Inc.
Wi-LAN, Inc. v. Alcatel-Lucent USA Inc. et al
as 3:2012cv02564
Plaintiff:
Wi-LAN, Inc.
Defendant:
Alcatel-Lucent USA Inc., Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson, Ericsson Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
