Cases 61 - 70 of 73
Wisdom v. Portfolio Recovery Associates LLC et al
as 3:2014cv00299
Plaintiff:
Bonnie Wisdom
Defendant:
Portfolio Recovery Associates LLC and DOE 1-5
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Myszka v. Portfolio Recovery Associates LLC et al
as 4:2013cv03090
Plaintiff:
Christopher Myszka
Defendant:
Portfolio Recovery Associates LLC and DOE 1-5
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Geary v. Lighthouse Recovery Associates, LLC et al
as 4:2013cv02288
Plaintiff:
Casey Geary
Defendant:
Lighthouse Recovery Associates, LLC, Cherry Creek Strategic Advisers, LLC, Demetrious Henderson and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Maher v. GC Services Limited Partnership et al
as 4:2013cv02059
Plaintiff:
Steven Maher
Defendant:
GC Services Limited Partnership and DOE 1-5
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Williams v. Asset Acceptance LLC et al
as 2:2013cv00161
Plaintiff:
Peggy Williams
Defendant:
Asset Acceptance LLC and DOE 1-5
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Dickey v. HOSTO & BUCHAN, PLLC. et al
as 4:2013cv00025
Plaintiff:
Brenda Dickey
Defendant:
HOSTO & BUCHAN, PLLC. and DOE 1-5
Cause Of Action: 88 U.S.C. § 8888 Other Statutory Actions
Van Der Hagen v. Portfolio Recovery Associates, L.L.C. et al
as 1:2012cv01043
Defendant:
DOE 1-5 and Portfolio Recovery Associates, L.L.C.
Plaintiff:
Mark Van Der Hagen
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Patton v. FMS, Inc. et al
as 1:2012cv00532
Plaintiff:
Edward Patton
Defendant:
FMS, Inc. and DOE 1-5
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Nell v. United Recovery Systems, LP et al
as 4:2012cv02997
Plaintiff:
Federico Nell
Defendant:
United Recovery Systems, LP and DOE 1-5
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
McKenzie v. Portfolio Recovery Associates
as 4:2012cv00548
Plaintiff:
Frank McKenzie
Defendant:
Portfolio Recovery Associates, L.L.C. and DOE 1-5
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
