Cases 81 - 90 of 105
RAMSEY et al v. U.S. BANCORP et al
as 2:2011cv03754
Plaintiff:
SCOTT RAMSEY
Defendant:
U.S. BANCORP , THE MONEYMAKER NETWORK, JOHN DOES 1-10 and others
Movant:
U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1693
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2011cv01083
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2011cv01079
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Marvin v. Executive Credit Bureau
as 3:2011cv00623
Plaintiff:
Donald Marvin
Defendant:
Executive Credit Bureau , John Does 1-10 and XYZ Corporations
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
MENEO v. FIRST FINANCIAL ASSET MANAGEMENT, INC. et al
as 1:2011cv00040
Plaintiff:
BARBARA MENEO
Defendant:
FIRST FINANCIAL ASSET MANAGEMENT, INC. , JOHN DOES 1-10 and XYZ CORPORATIONS
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
ARCHBOLD v. SPENCER SAVINGS BANK et al
as 2:2011cv00412
Plaintiff:
SARAH ARCHBOLD
Defendant:
SPENCER SAVINGS BANK , JOHN DOES 1-10 and XYZ CORPORATIONS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
WILLIAMS v. RESIDENTIAL MORTGAGE SOLUTIONS, LLC et al
as 2:2011cv00334
Plaintiff:
WADE A. WILLIAMS
Defendant:
RESIDENTIAL MORTGAGE SOLUTIONS, LLC , IMPERIAL LENDING, LLC, FIRST FLORIDA MORTGAGE CORP and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601
ARCHBOLD v. PROVIDENT FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC. et al
as 2:2011cv00315
Plaintiff:
SARAH ARCHBOLD
Defendant:
PROVIDENT FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC. , JOHN DOES 1-10 and XYZ CORPORATIONS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
PALOUIAN v. SCOTT LOWERY LAW OFFICES, P.C. et al
as 2:2010cv07425
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL J. PALOUIAN
Defendant:
SCOTT LOWERY LAW OFFICES, P.C. , ATTORNEYS AND COUNSELORS AT LAW, JOHN DOES 1-10 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2010cv02581
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
