Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Brett v. Trump et al
as 1:2021cv01383
Defendant:
John Thents, Mr. Brenichre, Carl Thume and others
Plaintiff:
Frank Brett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Securities and Exchange Commission v. Adams et al
as 1:2018mc00516
Defendant:
Madison Timber Properties, LLC and Arthur Lamar Adams
Plaintiff:
Securities and Exchange Commission
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0754
Gallagher v. Synchrony Bank
as 1:2017cv00174
Plaintiff:
Adam Gallagher
Defendant:
Synchrony Bank
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
Wood v. Hyundai Motor America
as 8:2016cv00681
Plaintiff:
Steven Adam Wood
Defendant:
Hyundai Motor America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Doe v. Lublin
as 1:2014cv01021
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe
Defendant:
Adam J. Lublin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Cofield v. Corizon, Inc. et al
as 1:2014cv00008
Plaintiff:
Keenan K. Cofield
Defendant:
Corizon Inc. , Eric H. Holder, Jr. , General Services Administration and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Doe v. Alter et al
as 1:2013cv01548
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe
Defendant:
Matthew Alter, Nathan Arger, Frederick Mervin Bardell and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Tort Action
Laramore v. Admin. Recovery, LLC et al
as 1:2011cv02468
Plaintiff:
David Laramore
Defendant:
Admin. Recovery, LLC, Adam Brown and Marzuila
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Federal Trade Commission v. Economic Relief Technologies, LLC et al
as 1:2009mc00399
Plaintiff:
Federal Trade Commission
Defendant:
Economic Relief Technologies, LLC, Saferide Warranty LLC, VP Marketing, LLC and others
Receiver:
Pat Huddleston, III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 754 Receiver of Property in Different Districts
Preller v. Bank of America et al
as 1:2007cv03174
Plaintiff:
Christopher Adam Preller
Defendant:
Bank of America and Equifax, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Fair Credit Reporti
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
