Other Statutory Actions Cases filed in District of Columbia
Cases 1 - 10 of 14
PRESS COALITIONS MOTION FOR ACCESS TO COMMUNITY SERVICE RECORDS et al
as 1:2021mc00166
In Re: PRESS COALITIONS MOTION FOR ACCESS TO COMMUNITY SERVICE RECORDS
Petitioner: CABLE NEWS NETWORK, INC., AMERICAN BROADCASTING COMPANIES, INC. doing business as ABC NEWS, ASSOCIATED PRESS and others
Respondent: LORI VINSON and THOMAS VINSON
IN RE PRESS COALITIONS MOTION FOR ACCESS TO VIDEO EXHIBITS AND TO PRESS COALITIONS MOTION FOR ACCESS TO VIDEO EXHIBITS AND TO SET ASIDE STANDING ORDER NO. 21-28
as 1:2021mc00084
Petitioner: BUZZFEED, INC. doing business as BUZZFEED NEWS, GANNETT CO., INC., NATIONAL PUBLIC RADIO, INC. and others
Respondent: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
In Re: APPLICATION FOR ACCESS TO CERTAIN SEALED VIDEO EXHIBITS
IN RE: PRESS COALITION'S MOTION FOR ACCESS TO VIDEO EXHIBITS AND TO SET ASIDE STANDING ORDER NO. 21-28
as 1:2021mc00087
Petitioner: BUZZFEED, INC. doing business as BUZZFEED NEWS, NATIONAL PUBLIC RADIO, INC., DOW JONES & COMPANY, INC. and others
Interested Party: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
In Re: PRESS COALITION'S MOTION FOR ACCESS TO VIDEO EXHIBITS AND TO SET ASIDE STANDING ORDER NO. 21-28
IN RE: PRESS COALITION'S MOTION FOR ACCESS TO VIDEO EXHIBITS AND TO SET ASIDE STANDING ORDER NO. 21-28
as 1:2021mc00086
Petitioner: BUZZFEED, INC. doing business as BUZZFEED NEWS, NATIONAL PUBLIC RADIO, INC., DOW JONES & COMPANY, INC. and others
Interested Party: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
In Re: PRESS COALITION'S MOTION FOR ACCESS TO VIDEO EXHIBITS AND TO SET ASIDE STANDING ORDER NO. 21-28
IN RE: PRESS AND PUBLIC ACCESS TO VIDEO EXHIBITS IN THE CAPITOL RIOT CASES We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2021mc00046
Petitioner: BUZZFEED, INC. doing business as BUZZFEED NEWS, NBCUNIVERSAL MEDIA, LLC, DOW JONES & COMPANY, INC. and others
Interested Party: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
In Re: PRESS AND PUBLIC ACCESS TO VIDEO EXHIBITS IN THE CAPITOL RIOT CASES
Amicus Curiae: FEDERAL PUBLIC DEFENDER FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
IN RE: APPLICATION FOR ACCESS TO CERTAIN SEALED VIDEO EXHIBITS
as 1:2021mc00034
Petitioner: BUZZFEED, INC. doing business as BUZZFEED NEWS, NATIONAL PUBLIC RADIO, INC., DOW JONES & COMPANY, INC. and others
Interested Party: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
In Re: APPLICATION FOR ACCESS TO CERTAIN SEALED VIDEO EXHIBITS
IN RE: JUROR QUESTIONNAIRES IN UNITED STATES V. STONE
as 1:2020mc00016
Respondent: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and ROGER JASON STONE, JR.
In Re: JUROR QUESTIONNAIRES IN UNITED STATES V. STONE
Petitioner: MICHAEL CERNOVICH
Amicus Curiae: TULLY CENTER FOR FREE SPEECH, GANNETT CO., INC., INTERNATIONAL DOCUMENTARY ASSN. and others
Intervenor: JURORS
KUPPERMAN v. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES OF THE U.S.A. et al Featured Case We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2019cv03224
Plaintiff: CHARLES M KUPPERMAN and CHARLES M. KUPPERMAN
Defendant: HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES OF THE U.S.A., CAROLYN B. MALONEY, NANCY PELOSI and others
Petitioner: CABLE NEWS NETWORK, INC., NEW YORK TIMES COMPANY, DOW JONES & COMPANY, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2201 Declaratory Judgment
IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION OF THE ASSOCIATED PRESS; CABLE NEWS NETWORK, INC.; THE NEW YORK TIMES CO.; POLITICO LLC; AND WP CO., LLC, et al
as 1:2019mc00174
In Re: IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION OF THE ASSOCIATED PRESS; CABLE NEWS NETWORK, INC.; THE NEW YORK TIMES CO.; POLITICO LLC; AND WP CO., LLC,
Petitioner: ASSOCIATED PRESS, NEW YORK TIMES CO, CABLE NEWS NETWORK, INC. and others
Interested Party: MICHAEL T. FLYNN and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
APPLICATION OF THE ASSOCIATED PRESS; CABLE NEWS NETWORK, INC.; THE NEW YORK TIMES CO.; POLITICO LLC; AND WP CO., LLC et al
as 1:2019mc00029
In Re: APPLICATION OF THE ASSOCIATED PRESS; CABLE NEWS NETWORK, INC.; THE NEW YORK TIMES CO.; POLITICO LLC; AND WP CO., LLC
Petitioner: NEW YORK TIMES COMPANY, ASSOCIATED PRESS, CABLE NEWS NETWORK, INC. and others
Respondent: ROGER STONE and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?