Cases 1 - 5 of 5
Rational Special Situations Income Fund v. Bank of New York Mellon Corp. et al
as 1:2022cv01651
Plaintiff:
Rational Special Situations Income Fund
Defendant:
Bank of New York Mellon Corp. and Syncora Guarantee Inc.
Nominal Defendant:
The Voyager CWABS 126685AT3 DEL TR 2009-1 Trust and The Voyager CNTYW 126685DS2 DEL TR 2009-1 Trust
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 ni Fed. Question: Negotiable Instrument
Nicholas DeBaggis, et al v. US Bank, N.A., et al
as 16-16527
:
In re: MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC REGISTRATION SYSTEMS (MERS) LITIGATION
Plaintiff - Appellant:
NICHOLAS DEBAGGIS, ROSA A. SILVAS, JONATHAN E. ROBINSON and others
Defendant - Appellee:
US BANK, N.A., BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON CORP., WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., DBA America's Servicing Company and others
Gray v. Nationstar Mortgage LLC et al
as 2:2015cv03008
Plaintiff:
Kevin Gray
Defendant:
Nationstar Mortgage LLC, The Bank of New York Mellon Corporation as Trustee of Structured Adjustable Rate Mortgage Loan Trust, Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates Series 2004-6 and The Bank of New York Mellon Corp as Trustee of the SARM Series 2004-6
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1640
In re: Jonathan Robinson, et al v. American Home Mortgage Serv., et al
as 11-17615
Defendant / Appellee:
PNC FINANCIAL SERVICES GROUP, INC., NDEX WEST LLC, OLD REPUBLIC NATIONAL TITLE INSURANCE CO. and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BRYAN GRAY, [for complete list of plaintiff/appellants, see Notice of Appeal], MARIA C. CASAS, TYRONE EVENSON and others
Not Classified By Court:
In re: MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC REGISTRATION SYSTEMS, INC.
Grisham et al v. Lawyers Title of Treasure Valley et al
as 1:2011cv00343
Plaintiff:
Abram W. Grisham and Challis Grisham
Defendant:
Lawyers Title of Treasure Valley, American Home Mortgage Servicing, Inc. , Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc. (MERS) and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
