Cases 1 - 9 of 9
TOMLISON, JR. et al v. ANDREWS AND COX, P.C.
as 1:2018cv03256
Plaintiff:
OATHER TOMLISON, JR. and DEBRA TOMLISON
Defendant:
ANDREWS AND COX, P.C.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
LARDIZABAL v. ANDREWS AND COX, P.C et al
as 2:2018cv00072
Defendant:
AMERICAN ACCEPTANCE CO., LLC, and ANDREWS AND COX, P.C
Plaintiff:
JOSE LARDIZABAL
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
COX et al v. DOYLE & FOUTTY, P.C.
as 1:2016cv02092
Plaintiff:
TAMARA COX and WILLIAM COX
Defendant:
DOYLE & FOUTTY, P.C.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
BAUGHMAN v. ANDREWS & COX, P.C. et al
as 1:2015cv00202
Defendant:
ANDREWS & COX, P.C., BOSTON PORTFOLIO ADVISORS, INC., EDUCATION RESOURCES INSTITUTE, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
JENNIFER L. BAUGHMAN
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
COX v. MILLER, ESQ.
as 1:2014cv00664
Plaintiff:
RHONDA COX
Defendant:
ALAN R MILLER, ESQ.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
ELDEM v. ERIN CAPITAL MANAGEMENT, LLC et al
as 1:2013cv02052
Defendant:
JULIA M ANDREWS, ANDREWS & COX, P.C., BLEECKER, BRODEY & ANDREWS and others
Plaintiff:
UMIT ELDEM
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
GRUBBS v. AMERICAN FINANCIAL CREDIT SERVICES, INC. et al
as 1:2013cv01936
Defendant:
AMERICAN FINANCIAL CREDIT SERVICES, INC., ANDREWS & COX, PC, BLEECKER, BRODEY & ANDREWS and others
Plaintiff:
JAMES BRENT GRUBBS
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
BOYD et al v. HOFFCO/COMET INDUSTRIES, INC et al
as 1:2011cv01396
Plaintiff:
ARNOLD BOYD, ALAN J COX, RICHARD D. MARTIN and others
Defendant:
HOFFCO/COMET INDUSTRIES, INC and TENAX CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
COX v. LAW OFFICES OF BENNETT DELONEY & NOYES, P.C.
as 1:2008cv00636
Plaintiff:
AUBREY COX, AUBREY COX and AUBREY COX
Defendant:
LAW OFFICES OF BENNETT DELONEY & NOYES, P.C.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
