Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Sandoval et al v. Bosley et al
as 1:2024cv00485
Plaintiff:
Michelle Sandoval, Samuel Herrera, Arthur Martinez and others
Defendant:
John Bosley, Bosley Management, Inc, Santa Clara Apartments and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Rodriguez v. Adventist Health System/Sunbelt, Inc.
as 6:2021mc00091
Plaintiff:
Danielle Rodriguez
Defendant:
Adventist Health System/Sunbelt, Inc. doing business as AdventHealth Kissimmee
Ortiz et al v. Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
as 1:2018cv12274
Plaintiff:
Vanessa Phillips, Vernessa Richard, Cristobal Lopez and others
Defendant:
Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 2333
Morris et al v. Islamic Republic of Iran
as 1:2018cv05321
Plaintiff:
Horace Morris , Linda Morrone , George Jebrine and others
Defendant:
Islamic Republic of Iran
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 2333
Deninah Goodwin v. City of New Orleans, et al
as 14-30388
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DENINAH GOODWIN, Rev.; Individually and on behalf of Hattie Goodwin, deceased and Christenina I. Webb, minor child
Defendant - Appellee:
HOUSING AUTHORITY OF NEW ORLEANS, WELLS FARGO HOME MORTGAGE, CITY OF BAYTOWN, TEXAS and others
Daniel Rodriguez v. Sony Computer Entertainment Am, et al
as 12-17391
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DANIEL RODRIGUEZ, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated
Defendant - Appellee:
SONY COMPUTER ENTERTAINMENT AMERICA, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company and SONY NETWORK ENTERTAINMENT INTERNATIONAL, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company
Rodriguez v. Sony Computer Entertainment America, LLC
as 4:2011cv04084
Plaintiff:
Daniel Rodriguez
Defendant:
Sony Computer Entertainment America, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Cintas Corporation v. Hamby et al
as 3:2006cv05116
Petitioner:
Cintas Corporation
Respondent:
Anthony Dean Hamby, Chris Sylvia, Daniel Rodriguez and others
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
