Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Red River Farms et al v. United States of America et al
as 2:2008cv02078
Plaintiff:
Red River Farms, Red River Farms, Robert Mullion and others
Defendant:
United States of America, Treasury, Department of the, Henry M Paulson, Jr and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Svobodova v. Chertoff et al
as 2:2007cv02316
Petitioner:
Ludmila Svobodova and Ludmila Svobodova
Respondent:
Michael Chertoff, Michael Mukasey, Emilio T Gonzalez and others
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Naturalization Hearing
Nagy v. Chertoff et al
as 2:2007cv02227
Petitioner:
Marga Nagy
Defendant:
Michael Chertoff, Michael B. Mukasey, Emilio T Gonzalez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Fajardo v. Gonzales et al
as 2:2007cv01755
Plaintiff:
Jorge Fajardo
Defendant:
Alberto Gonzales, Michael Chertoff, Emilio T Gonzalez and others
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Naturalization Hearing
Atalla et al v. Gonzales et al
as 2:2007cv01704
Plaintiff:
Jamal Atalla and Nadia Katrangi
Defendant:
Alberto Gonzales, Department of Justice, Michael Chertoff and others
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Naturalization Hearing
Veloz-Davila v. US Department of Homeland Security et al
as 4:2007cv00140
Plaintiff:
Juan Jose Veloz-Davila
Defendant:
US Department of Homeland Security and Evelyn Upchurch
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Alcala-Marquez v. US Department of Homeland Security, et al.,
as 2:2007cv00200
Plaintiff:
Marco Alcala-Marquez
Defendant:
Michael Chertoff and US Department of Homeland Security
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Tantawy v. Michael Chertoff et al.
as 2:2007cv00154
Plaintiff:
Ramy Salama Tantawy
Defendant:
Michael Chertoff, United States Citizenship and Immigration Services, Emilio T Gonzalez and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
