Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Diversus Health, Inc. v. John Does 1-10
as 1:2023cv01414
Defendant:
Diversus Health, Inc. and John Does 1-10
Considine Investment Company v. Doe I
as 1:2022cv03082
Plaintiff:
Considine Investment Company
Defendant:
John Doe I
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 2701 Unlawful Access To Stored Communications
Tripwireless, Inc. v. Doe
as 1:2022cv02738
Plaintiff:
Tripwireless Inc. and Tripwireless, Inc.
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Unfair Competition (Lanham Act)
Carrio Cabling Corporation v. Stryker Corporation
as 1:2019cv01937
Defendant:
John Doe and Stryker Corporation
Plaintiff:
Carrio Cabling Corporation
Doe 1 et al v. United States Olympic Committee
as 1:2019cv00902
Defendant:
Angela M. Ruggiero, Ursula M. Burns, John S. Hendricks and others
Plaintiff:
Jane ALC Doe 29, Jane KRA Doe 32, Jane KM Doe 15 and others
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1681
Deppen v. Aspen National Financial, Inc.
as 1:2018cv01563
Defendant:
Aspen National Financial, Inc. and Aspen National Financial, Inc. and John Does 1-25 doing business as Aspen National Collections
Plaintiff:
Maryjo Deppen and Mary jo Paff
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Colorado Republican Committee v. Doe
as 1:2016cv01058
Plaintiff:
Colorado Republican Committee
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1030
Continental Volkswagen, LLC v. Doe
as 1:2013cv01625
Plaintiff:
Continental Volkswagen, LLC
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Unfair Competition (Lanham Act)
LP Broadband, Inc. v. John Does 1-5
as 1:2013cv01330
Plaintiff:
LP Broadband, Inc.
Defendant:
John Does 1-5
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1030 g Fraud & Related Matters in Connection w/ Computers
Davidson v. BC Services, Inc. et al
as 1:2013cv00702
Plaintiff:
Shantel Davidson
Defendant:
BC Services, Inc., John Doe #1 and John Doe #2
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
