Cases 1 - 10 of 15
PATEL v. TRUMP et al
as 1:2020cv00454
Defendant:
PATRICIA O'HARA, PIKUL PATEL, 101 ADMINISTRATION BUILDING and others
Plaintiff:
RAJ K. PATEL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
CARR v. MIDLAND FUNDING, LLC et al
as 4:2018cv00233
Defendant:
MIDLAND FUNDING, LLC and LLOYD & MCDANIEL, PLC
Plaintiff:
CONNIE CARR
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
UNDERWRITERS AT LLOYDS SUBSCRIBING TO COVER NOTE B0901LC1515354000 v. OVERNIGHT LLC et al
as 1:2017cv01174
Defendant:
MERITOR, INC. and OVERNIGHT LLC
Plaintiff:
UNDERWRITERS AT LLOYDS SUBSCRIBING TO COVER NOTE B0901LC1515354000
Cause Of Action: 49 U.S.C. § 14706 Carmack Amendment to the Interstate Commerce Act
GORDON v. CAVALRY SPV I, LLC et al
as 3:2016cv00237
Defendant:
CAVALRY SPV I, LLC and LLOYD & MCDANIEL PLC
Plaintiff:
KRISTIE GORDON
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
WARREN v. LLOYD & MCDANIEL, PLC
as 1:2016cv03151
Defendant:
LLOYD & MCDANIEL, PLC
Plaintiff:
CHARLES WARREN
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
CASTRO v. LLOYD & MCDANIEL, PLC
as 1:2015cv00559
Plaintiff:
DENNIS CASTRO
Defendant:
LLOYD & MCDANIEL, PLC and PCA ACQUISITIONS V, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
SMITH v. LLOYD & MCDANIEL, PLC
as 1:2012cv00584
Defendant:
LLOYD & MCDANIEL, PLC
Plaintiff:
GERALD W. SMITH
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
SPRATT v. ASSET ACCEPTANCE LLC et al
as 1:2012cv00321
Defendant:
ASSET ACCEPTANCE LLC and LLOYD & MCDANIEL, PLC
Plaintiff:
PEGGY A SPRATT
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
SCHWARTZWALD v. LLOYD & MCDANIEL PLC
as 1:2010cv00473
Defendant:
LLOYD & MCDANIEL PLC
Plaintiff:
DUANE SCHWARTZWALD
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
SCHWARTZWALD v. LLOYD & MCDANIEL PLC
as 1:2010cv00474
Defendant:
LLOYD & MCDANIEL PLC
Plaintiff:
JULIE SCHWARTZWALD
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
