Cases 1 - 10 of 11
MEDINA v. NCB MANAGEMENT SERVICES, INC.
as 2:2023cv01270
Plaintiff:
ERNESTO MEDINA
Defendant:
NCB MANAGEMENT SERVICES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 2721 Federal Drivers Privacy Protection Act
LESCHACK v. PNC BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION et al
as 2:2017cv01185
Plaintiff:
MARK LESCHACK
Defendant:
PNC BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION , NCB MANAGEMENT SERVICES, INC. and CREDIT COLLECTION SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
BARBAGLI v. NCB MANAGEMENT SERVICES, INC.
as 2:2014cv02082
Plaintiff:
KENNETH BARBAGLI, JR.
Defendant:
NCB MANAGEMENT SERVICES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Hartley-Culp v. NCB Management Services, Inc.
as 3:2014cv00402
Plaintiff:
Dawn Hartley-Culp
Defendant:
NCB Management Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
HOLMES-HINES v. NCB MANAGEMENT SERVICES, INC.
as 2:2012cv06687
Plaintiff:
ELLA HOLMES-HINES
Defendant:
NCB MANAGEMENT SERVICES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
BIERNAT v. NCB MANAGEMENT SERVICES, INC.
as 2:2008cv01699
Plaintiff:
ROBIN BIERNAT
Defendant:
NCB MANAGEMENT SERVICES, INC.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
SAMAJ et al v. NCB MANAGEMENT SERVICES, INC.
as 2:2008cv01574
Plaintiff:
ANDREW JOHN SAMAJ, III and ANDREW JOHN SAMAJ, JR.
Defendant:
NCB MANAGEMENT SERVICES, INC.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
SHACREAW v. NCB MANAGEMENT SERVICES, INC.
as 2:2008cv00163
Plaintiff:
KIMBERLY SHACREAW
Defendant:
NCB MANAGEMENT SERVICES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
HULLINGER v. NCB MANAGEMENT SERVICES, INC.
as 2:2007cv04684
Plaintiff:
NANCY HULLINGER
Defendant:
NCB MANAGEMENT SERVICES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
BLOOMER v. NCB MANAGEMENT SERVICES, INC.
as 2:2007cv04312
Plaintiff:
ELIZABETH BLOOMER
Defendant:
NCB MANAGEMENT SERVICES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
