Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Peck v. Southern Illinois Hospital Services et al
as 3:2019cv00383
Plaintiff:
Richard Neal Peck
Defendant:
ClaimAssist, LLC and Southern Illinois Hospital Services
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395
Neal v. CHW Group, Inc.
as 1:2018cv07267
Defendant:
CHW Group, Inc. d/b/a Choice Home Warranty and CHW Group, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Michael Neal
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Shore v. Dyck O'Neal
as 1:2017cv06890
Plaintiff:
William Shore
Defendant:
Dyck O'Neal
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
O'Neal v. Cenlar FSB
as 1:2015cv08433
Plaintiff:
Rozella O'Neal
Defendant:
Cenlar FSB
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601
In re: Herbal Supplements Marketing and Sales Practices Litigation
as 1:2015cv05070
Plaintiff:
Louetta Schulze, Thomas Moors, John Hollis and others
Defendant:
Walgreen Co., General Nutrition Corp., Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. and others
In Re:
In re: Herbal Supplements Marketing and Sales Practices Litigation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Neal v. Asset Acceptance, LLC
as 1:2013cv06933
Plaintiff:
Ruth Neal
Defendant:
Asset Acceptance, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Neal, Jr. v. Palisades Collection, LLC et al
as 1:2012cv01224
Plaintiff:
William A. Neal, Jr.
Defendant:
Palisades Collection, LLC and AID Associates Inc
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Neal et al v. Diez
as 1:2011cv07406
Plaintiff:
Robert L. Neal and Angela C. Cotton
Defendant:
Deborah A. Diez and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Todd v. MSI Credit Solutions LLC et al
as 1:2011cv02988
Plaintiff:
Michael Todd
Defendant:
MSI Credit Solutions LLC, Robert Adam Neal and Ricardo Mendiola
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Cheney v. Tek-Collect Incorporated et al
as 1:2009cv08052
Plaintiff:
James R Cheney, Jr and James R Cheney, Jr
Defendant:
Tek-Collect Incorporated and John G Neal
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
