Cases 1 - 8 of 8
In Re: Raytheon Company
as 4:2015mc00003
Respondent:
Johnson Controls, Arizona, State of, Tucson Airport Authority and others
Intervenor Defendant:
University of Arizona and Arizona Board of Regents
In Re:
Raytheon Company
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Barbara Sherrill v. Arizona Health Care Cost Conta, et al
as 14-16541
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BARBARA ELLEN SHERRILL
Defendant - Appellee:
ARIZONA HEALTH CARE COST CONTAINMENT SYSTEM, State of Arizona Agency, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, PIMA COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT and others
Pima, County of v. ATF Documentation and Information
as 4:2014mc00003
Petitioner:
Pima, County of
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Mesquite Grove Chapel, et al v. Pima County Board of Adjustmen, et al
as 13-16633
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MESQUITE GROVE CHAPEL, an Arizona not-for-profit corporation and DEBI FAZIO, a married woman
Defendant - Appellee:
PIMA COUNTY BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT and CARMINE DEBONIS, in his capacity as Pima County Chief Zoning Inspector
Sherrill v. Arizona Health Care Cost Containment System et al
as 4:2013cv00195
Plaintiff:
Barbara E Sherrill
Defendant:
Arizona Health Care Cost Containment System , United States Department of Health and Human Services, Pima, County of and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1396 - Tort Negligence
Mesquite Grove Chapel et al v. Pima County Board of Adjustment et al
as 4:2010cv00769
Plaintiff:
Mesquite Grove Chapel and Debi Fazio
Defendant:
Pima County Board of Adjustment and Tina Whittemore
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Pima, County of v. FBI Documentation and Information
as 4:2010mc00045
Movant:
Pima, County of
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Desert American Builders Corp v. Pima County, Arizona
as 4:2007cv00347
Defendant:
Pima County, Arizona
Plaintiff:
Desert American Builders Corp
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
