Cases 1 - 6 of 6
State of Texas v. Garland
as 24-10386
Plaintiff:
State of Texas
Defendant:
Merrick Garland, U.S. Attorney General, in his official capacity as United States Attorney General, Charlotte A. Burrows, in her official capacity as Chair of the U.S Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Jocelyn Samuels, in her official capacity as Vice Chair of the U.S Equal Employment Opportunity Commission and others
M. A. et al v. MAYORKAS et al
as 1:2023cv01843
Plaintiff:
M. A., R. S., M. P. and others
Defendant:
ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, UR JADDOU and others
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1101 Immigration and Nationality Act
State of Texas v. Department of Justice et al
as 5:2023cv00034
Plaintiff:
State of Texas
Defendant:
Department of Justice, Merrick Garland, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission and others
Amicus Curiae:
Ten Members of Congress
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)
ASYLUM SEEKERS TRYING TO ASSURE THEIR SAFETY v. JOHNSON et al
as 1:2023cv00163
Plaintiff:
ASYLUM SEEKERS TRYING TO ASSURE THEIR SAFETY
Defendant:
TAE D. JOHNSON, ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, MERRICK GARLAND and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706 Judicial Review of Agency Actions
Babai v. USA
as 22-20602
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Mohammed R. Babai
Defendant / Appellee:
United States of America, Alejandro Mayorkas, Secretary, U.S. Department of Homeland Security, United States Department of Homeland Security and others
AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION OF FLORIDA et al v. U.S. IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT et al
as 1:2022cv01129
Plaintiff:
AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION OF FLORIDA and CITIZENS FOR RESPONSIBILITY AND ETHICS IN WASHINGTON
Defendant:
U.S. IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT, TAE D. JOHNSON, NATIONAL ARCHIVES AND RECORDS ADMINISTRATION and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706 Judicial Review of Agency Actions
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
